Today, the Eighth Circuit held that St. Louis’ Land Clearance Redevelopment Authority must face the music for attempting to shut down Jim Roos’ very public protest of eminent domain abuse. As you may recall from an earlier post, LCRA officials first told Roos that he had to get their approval before he put up his anti–eminent domain sign, then tried to argue that Roos couldn’t sue them because the agency never really possessed the authority it had claimed when it tried to squelch Roos’ right to political expression. Fortunately, good sense prevailed and the judges have sent this matter back to the trial court to determine whether Roos’ protest is, in fact, entitled to constitutional protection.
State and Local Government
|
By
Dave Roland
|
Read Time 1 minute
Similar Stories
Economy
|
ARTICLE
|
Massachusetts Joins NYC and KC in Shifting Fees to Landlords
By Scott Tanner
|
Read Time 3 minutes
Accountability
|
ARTICLE
|
Most Teachers Don’t Like Equitable Grading Practices Either
By Scott Tanner
|
Read Time 2 minutes
Budget and Spending
|
ARTICLE
|
A Free-Market Guide to Zoning with David Stokes
By Susan Pendergrass
|
Read Time 22 minutes