Nietzsche Versus the Associated Press

Health Care |
By David Stokes | Read Time 2 minutes

The Post-Dispatch is hosting a truly stupid AP article lamenting that the nation’s uninsured (as in health, not personal effects) don’t band together to force change in Washington, D.C. “Change” here would, of course, involve making people who pay taxes pay more, so that people who don’t (with plenty of exceptions) can have health insurance given to them. Any potential problems with this utopia are ignored by the AP writer.

Articles like this make Nietzsche’s (one word, I am proud to say, I can spell without any help) prediction about democracy seem relevant (emphasis added in all of this blog entry’s quotes):

All political powers nowadays try to exploit the fear of socialism in order to strengthen themselves. But in the long run it is democracy alone that derives the advantage: for all parties are nowadays obliged to flatter the “people” and to bestow on it alleviations and liberties of every kind through which it will in the end become omnipotent. As socialism is a doctrine that the acquisition of property ought to be abolished, the people are as alienated from it as they could be: and once they have got the power of taxation into their hands through their great parliamentary majorities they will assail the capitalists, the merchants and the princes of the stock exchange with a progressive tax and slowly create in fact a middle class which will be in a position to forget socialism like an illness it has recovered from.

Consider this along with the AP story, which seems to be begging for the uninsured to band together and collectively demand to be covered — and not with some radical idea like health savings accounts, you can be sure:

But going without health insurance is still seen as a personal issue, a misfortune for many and a choice for some. People who lose coverage often struggle alone instead of turning their frustration into political action.

The tone of the article — although maybe I am reading it wrong — suggests that the idea that some might choose to be uninsured is insane, or that the reporter can’t comprehend the thought some people who don’t have insurance might actually not want to force others to provide it.

About the Author

David Stokes is a St. Louis native and a graduate of Saint Louis University High School and Fairfield (Conn.) University. He spent six years as a political aide at the St. Louis County Council before joining the Show-Me Institute in 2007. Stokes was a policy analyst at the Show-Me Institute from 2007 to 2016. From 2016 through 2020 he was Executive Director of Great Rivers Habitat Alliance, where he led efforts to oppose harmful floodplain developments done with abusive tax subsidies. Stokes rejoined the Institute in early 2021 as the Director of Municipal Policy. He is a past president of the University City Library Board. He served on the St. Louis County 2010 Council Redistricting Commission and was the 2012 representative to the Electoral College from Missouri’s First Congressional District. He lives in University City with his wife and their three children.

Similar Stories

Support Us

Headline to go here about the good with supporting us.

Donate
Man on Horse Charging