Kansas City’s Property Tax Abatement Problem

Corporate Welfare |
By Patrick Tuohey | Read Time 2 minutes minutes

Just the other day, an unsigned Kansas City Star editorial considered the near future for the new Kansas City Council:

Supporters of universal pre-kindergarten have discussed asking voters to endorse a property tax increase, within the Kansas City Public Schools boundaries, to finance programs designed to get young children off to a stronger start in life. James has made education one of his four main tenets when it comes to improving the city’s quality of life. But will the full council agree to back a tax increase that doesn’t flow into the city’s coffers and instead goes for someone else’s priority?

Never mind that this is the same Star that just asked the City to excuse it from paying $10 million in property tax to the school district. Now that it has been exempted, it wonders if the tax rate should be increased for others.

This would be humorous if it weren’t so sad. The Star is not alone; the city regularly abates property taxes in the name of economic development. In fact, whenever you hear about development in Kansas City, the chances are that the city offered the developer a subsidy of some sort. 

As a result of these abatements, schools, libraries, the county and programs that support mental health services and the zoo are being denied funds. As of 2013 the Kansas City school district suffered a $470,000,000 gap between the assessed value of real estate and the value at which it is taxed. 

That’s almost a half-billion dollars of land value that is going untaxed in the Kansas City school district alone. At the 2014 county property tax rate, that amounts to over $23 million each year in forgone revenue. As a result, the district doesn’t have money to pursue a universal pre-K program the Star thinks is so laudable.

City leaders who allow property owners to pay less than the full share of their tax may be the greatest obstacles to fully funded education. Are they really going to ask rank-and-file taxpayers to make up the difference?

Kansas City doesn’t need a higher property tax rate, it needs to make sure more people are paying their fair share.

About the Author

Patrick Tuohey is a senior fellow at the Show-Me Institute and co-founder and policy director of the Better Cities Project. Both organizations aim to deliver the best in public policy research from around the country to local leaders, communities and voters. He works to foster understanding of the consequences — often unintended — of policies regarding economic development, taxation, education, policing, and transportation. In 2021, Patrick served as a fellow of the Robert J. Dole Institute of Politics at the University of Kansas. He is currently a visiting fellow at the Yorktown Foundation for Public Policy in Virginia and also a regular opinion columnist for The Kansas City Star. Previously, Patrick served as the director of municipal policy at the Show-Me Institute. Patrick’s essays have been published widely in print and online including in newspapers around the country, The Hill, and Reason Magazine. His essays on economic development, education, and policing have been published in the three most recent editions of the Greater Kansas City Urban League’s “State of Black Kansas City.” Patrick’s work on the intersection of those topics spurred parents and activists to oppose economic development incentive projects where they are not needed and was a contributing factor in the KCPT documentary, “Our Divided City” about crime, urban blight, and public policy in Kansas City. Patrick received a bachelor’s degree from Boston College in 1993.

Similar Stories

Support Us

Headline to go here about the good with supporting us.

Donate
Man on Horse Charging