Criminal Justice Reform: Raising the Age

State and Local Government |
By Patrick Tuohey | Read Time 2 minutes minutes

As Missourians consider the many ways to improve and reform the criminal justice system, at least one option appears to be relatively low-hanging fruit: raising the age at which offenders are automatically put into the adult criminal justice system from 17 to 18.

Under the so-called Raise the Age effort, introduced in the Missouri Senate as SB40, 17-year-olds will be prosecuted under the juvenile court system unless they have been certified as adults—often due to the nature or severity of their crimes. This would be a welcome change—only six other states presumptively treat 17-year-olds as adults.

Treating 17-year-olds as adults dramatically reduces the role of family in the criminal justice system. Police are not required to notify the parents if a 17-year-old, often a high school junior or senior, is arrested and detained. Children can be interrogated and even agree to plea bargains without a parent ever knowing of the arrest!

In addition, adult prisons are notoriously ill-equipped to deal with the needs of children and do little if anything to help them continue their education or offer rehabilitation services. Recent federal law requires that prisons adopt important—and expensive—protections for children, among them providing education resources and separating them from the adult population.

Raising the age by which an offender is automatically placed into courts of general jurisdiction mitigates much of the costly need to retrofit adult prisons to protect children, offers children important educational and rehabilitative services, and respects the role of family. As long as it does not conflict with the ability of courts to treat serious offenders as adults when necessary—such as when they have engaged in gang activites—this is a reform worthy of legislative support.

About the Author

Patrick Tuohey is a senior fellow at the Show-Me Institute and co-founder and policy director of the Better Cities Project. Both organizations aim to deliver the best in public policy research from around the country to local leaders, communities and voters. He works to foster understanding of the consequences — often unintended — of policies regarding economic development, taxation, education, policing, and transportation. In 2021, Patrick served as a fellow of the Robert J. Dole Institute of Politics at the University of Kansas. He is currently a visiting fellow at the Yorktown Foundation for Public Policy in Virginia and also a regular opinion columnist for The Kansas City Star. Previously, Patrick served as the director of municipal policy at the Show-Me Institute. Patrick’s essays have been published widely in print and online including in newspapers around the country, The Hill, and Reason Magazine. His essays on economic development, education, and policing have been published in the three most recent editions of the Greater Kansas City Urban League’s “State of Black Kansas City.” Patrick’s work on the intersection of those topics spurred parents and activists to oppose economic development incentive projects where they are not needed and was a contributing factor in the KCPT documentary, “Our Divided City” about crime, urban blight, and public policy in Kansas City. Patrick received a bachelor’s degree from Boston College in 1993.

Similar Stories

Support Us

Headline to go here about the good with supporting us.

Donate
Man on Horse Charging