School Choice Case Study: Charter Schools in Los Angeles

Education |
By Scott Tanner | Read Time 2 minutes minutes

A 2024 study published in Education Finance and Policy finds that enrollment in one of five popular charter high schools in Los Angeles significantly improves student test scores, as well as college enrollment and persistence.

This study stands out for its rigorous research design, which credibly estimates the causal effects of attending these schools. Each of the five schools is oversubscribed, meaning more students want to attend than the number of available seats. Admission is determined by random lottery: students whose numbers are randomly drawn are offered admission, while those not selected are not. By comparing outcomes for lottery winners and losers, the researchers can isolate the causal impacts of attending the charter schools on student outcomes.

The schools serve a predominantly low-income Black and Latino population and adhere to the “no excuses” charter model. This model features extended instructional time, mandatory uniforms, strict discipline and structure, and high expectations around academic performance and college attendance. Although “no excuses” schools have recently fallen out of favor, research—including this study—continues to show their effectiveness. The authors describe their findings as showing “large positive effects of enrolling in a high-quality, ‘no excuses’ charter school on academic achievement, enrollment in any college, enrollment in any four-year college, and persistence to the second year of a four-year college” (p. 568).

(The reasons why the “no excuses” model has fallen out of favor are perplexing to me, but this is a topic for a different time. It is especially frustrating because one reason this study is possible—along with numerous other similar studies—is that no excuses schools are regularly oversubscribed, which is a direct indicator that families value them.)

This study contributes to what is now a large body of research showing the transformative potential of school choice. In the face of mounting evidence on the poor performance of Missouri schools, we should embrace policies that can lead to meaningful improvements in student outcomes, including policies that create more school-choice opportunities for our children.

About the Author

Scott Tanner joined the Show-Me Institute in July of 2013. He earned a B.A. in political science from the College of Wooster. Scott previously worked for the Mitt Romney campaign in Iowa during both the caucuses and the general election of the 2012 cycle. In between, he worked at the Iowa State House for a legislative session. Scott is primarily interested in fiscal and economic policy and considers the Show-Me Institutes mission one of crucial importance. Scott lives in the Central West End neighborhood of Saint Louis City.

Similar Stories

Support Us

Headline to go here about the good with supporting us.

Donate
Man on Horse Charging