About That Border War Truce . . .

Corporate Welfare |
By Patrick Tuohey | Read Time 2 minutes minutes

Last fall, there was much rejoicing about the effort by Missouri Governor Mike Parson and Kansas Governor Laura Kelly to end the economic development border war between the two states. I was skeptical and said so at the time. Specifically, I worried important terms of the truce had not been defined, and as a result there was a lot of wiggle room. What I hadn’t anticipated was the number of “grandfathered” deals.

First was the $100 million Waddell & Reed deal, supposedly under negotiation prior to the truce, in which the company captured corporate tax incentives for itself by exposing its employees to higher income taxes. Now we learn of another deal for BlueScope, which is seeking perhaps as much as $20 million worth of incentives from Kansas to hop across the state line. The company is playing the states against each other. According to The Kansas City Star, Kansas City and Missouri are taking the bait:

All told, the company could receive about $14 million from Missouri and Kansas City to remain in the West Bottoms and add 15 jobs per year. That also includes $5.6 million from the state and a sales tax exemption on construction materials for improvements to the building.

Supporters of such business subsidies argue that this round of incentives won’t affect the various taxing jurisdictions. But they are wrong. As a representative for the Kansas City Public School District noted, the existing incentives are set to expire in 2022, meaning BlueScope would finally be paying its full tax burden. This new deal extends a 75 percent tax exemption for over a decade, thus robbing schools of funds they would otherwise receive. This gives the lie to the claim by then–Mayor Sly James that incentives are good because “when the incentives roll off then the tax base rises.” What if they never fully roll off?

Such incentives don’t live up to their claims of creating jobs or spurring investment. Kansas City has no business extending tax breaks when the city is already looking to cut five percent of its budget due to the economic hit of COVID-19. If BlueScope wants to leave, the city ought to let them go.

About the Author

Patrick Tuohey is a senior fellow at the Show-Me Institute and co-founder and policy director of the Better Cities Project. Both organizations aim to deliver the best in public policy research from around the country to local leaders, communities and voters. He works to foster understanding of the consequences — often unintended — of policies regarding economic development, taxation, education, policing, and transportation. In 2021, Patrick served as a fellow of the Robert J. Dole Institute of Politics at the University of Kansas. He is currently a visiting fellow at the Yorktown Foundation for Public Policy in Virginia and also a regular opinion columnist for The Kansas City Star. Previously, Patrick served as the director of municipal policy at the Show-Me Institute. Patrick’s essays have been published widely in print and online including in newspapers around the country, The Hill, and Reason Magazine. His essays on economic development, education, and policing have been published in the three most recent editions of the Greater Kansas City Urban League’s “State of Black Kansas City.” Patrick’s work on the intersection of those topics spurred parents and activists to oppose economic development incentive projects where they are not needed and was a contributing factor in the KCPT documentary, “Our Divided City” about crime, urban blight, and public policy in Kansas City. Patrick received a bachelor’s degree from Boston College in 1993.

Similar Stories

Support Us

Headline to go here about the good with supporting us.

Donate
Man on Horse Charging