Today, the Eighth Circuit held that St. Louis’ Land Clearance Redevelopment Authority must face the music for attempting to shut down Jim Roos’ very public protest of eminent domain abuse. As you may recall from an earlier post, LCRA officials first told Roos that he had to get their approval before he put up his anti–eminent domain sign, then tried to argue that Roos couldn’t sue them because the agency never really possessed the authority it had claimed when it tried to squelch Roos’ right to political expression. Fortunately, good sense prevailed and the judges have sent this matter back to the trial court to determine whether Roos’ protest is, in fact, entitled to constitutional protection.
State and Local Government
|
By
Dave Roland
|
Read Time 1 minute
Similar Stories
Why Missouri Needs Early Literacy Reform with Cory Koedel and Avery Frank
By Susan Pendergrass
|
Read Time 1 minute
Webster Groves Should Not Institute an Economic Development Sales Tax
By Scott Tanner
|
Read Time 3 minutes
The Data Center Debate Continues in Festus
By Scott Tanner
|
Read Time 3 minutes
Missouri’s Reading Crisis: 42% of Fourth-Graders Can Barely Read
By Cory Koedel
|
Read Time 1 minute