Today, the Eighth Circuit held that St. Louis’ Land Clearance Redevelopment Authority must face the music for attempting to shut down Jim Roos’ very public protest of eminent domain abuse. As you may recall from an earlier post, LCRA officials first told Roos that he had to get their approval before he put up his anti–eminent domain sign, then tried to argue that Roos couldn’t sue them because the agency never really possessed the authority it had claimed when it tried to squelch Roos’ right to political expression. Fortunately, good sense prevailed and the judges have sent this matter back to the trial court to determine whether Roos’ protest is, in fact, entitled to constitutional protection.
State and Local Government
|
By
Dave Roland
|
Read Time 1 minute
Similar Stories
Texas Advancing Its Own Checkbook Transparency Legislation
By Patrick Ishmael
|
Read Time 2 minutes
Who’s Afraid of Charter Schools?
By Susan Pendergrass
|
Read Time 7 minutes
Do Charter Schools Take Districts’ Money? Only If You Think Children, and the Funding That...
By James V. Shuls
|
Read Time 4 minutes
The Hidden Cost of Medicaid
By Elias Tsapelas
|
Read Time 3 minutes