In a piece published on National Review Online today, Michael McShane casts a critical eye on a study that touts extraordinary benefits from two 1970's-era preschool programs for disadvantaged children. A small sample size, along with the prohibitively expensive per-pupil cost of the program studied, give us reason to be cautious before assuming that the study's findings could be replicated on a large scale. Click here to read the entire piece.
About the Author
Michael Q. McShane
Michael Q. McShane is Senior Fellow of Education Policy at the Show-Me Institute. A former high school teacher, he earned a Ph.D. in education policy from the University of Arkansas, an M.Ed. from the University of Notre Dame, and a B.A. in English from St. Louis University. McShanes analyses and commentary have been published widely in the media, including in the Huffington Post, National Affairs, USA Today, and The Washington Post. He has also been featured in education-specific outlets such as Teachers College Commentary, Education Week, Phi Delta Kappan, and Education Next. In addition to authoring numerous white papers, McShane has had academic work published in Education Finance and Policy and the Journal of School Choice. He is the editor of New and Better Schools (Rowman and Littlefield, 2015), the author of Education and Opportunity (AEI Press, 2014), and coeditor of Teacher Quality 2.0 (Harvard Education Press, 2014) and Common Core Meets Education Reform (Teachers College Press, 2013).
Similar Stories
Massachusetts Joins NYC and KC in Shifting Fees to Landlords