What Makes a Good Tax Structure

Economy |
By Joseph Haslag | Read Time 2 minutes minutes

Have you ever looked at Chapter 143 of Title X of the Missouri Revised Statutes? This chapter applies to individual and corporate income taxes. Rather than go through a list of each subsection, we collected data on the number of subsections in Chapter 143 from 1973 through 2012. We plotted the number of effective subsections for each year in Figure 1. Clearly, things have changed over time, with the number of subsections increasing from 54 in 1973 to 154 in 2012.

The next question is, why have the number of subsections in Chapter 143 of Title X increased? Several possible answers apply. For one thing, no law is ever written perfectly the first time. So, new subsections refine things, such as loopholes that were not evident when the law was initially written and to redefine what income is subject to taxation. Additionally, the state assembly sees opportunities to use tax laws that seek to stimulate economic development by changing the amount of income subject to the state income tax. By implementing such changes, the carrot-and-stick approach aims to modify people’s behavior so that the Missouri economy will grow faster.

Third, if we started from scratch, would we implement the same set of subsections? The calls for tax reform are based on the notion that tax code becomes unnecessarily complicated over time. The view is that the number of laws that adjust taxable income changes over time complicate things by altering the set of deductions, exclusions, and credits that apply to taxpayers.4 Each filer must keep up in order to comply. Each new subsection adds a layer of new questions that taxpayers confront when filing their taxes. Do I qualify for the new tax credit? Does the new deduction apply to me? On the other hand, the filer risks either not complying or paying too much in taxes if he ignores new tax laws.

We have moved systematically through three questions. At the end, there is a case to be made for tax reform, if nothing else, to reduce the complexity and save people time. Tax reform, however, is not limited to dealing with the complexity issue. Indeed, it is also a good time to ask, what kind of taxes do the least harm to Missourians?

Read the essay: .

 

About the Author

Joseph Haslag is a professor and the Kenneth Lay Chair in economics at the University of Missouri Columbia. Until the end of 2018, Professor Haslag was the Institute's chief economist. An expert in monetary policy, Haslag has done research at the Federal Reserve Banks of Saint Louis, Dallas, and Atlanta. He serves on the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas Citys Economic Roundtable and the Federal Reserve Bank of Saint Louis Business Economic Regional Group. He has taught at Southern Methodist University, Erasmus University in Rotterdam, and Michigan State University. Haslag has published his research in the Journal of Monetary Economics, the Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, and the International Economic Review. His research has been cited in more than 100 academic papers. In his role as director of EPARC, Haslag is a standing member of the Consensus Revenue Forecasting Group that forecasts state revenues for state legislators and the governor.

Similar Publications

Support Us

The work of the Show-Me Institute would not be possible without the generous support of people who are inspired by the vision of liberty and free enterprise. We hope you will join our efforts and become a Show-Me Institute sponsor.

Donate
Man on Horse Charging