School Transfers: The Answer Is More Choice, Not Less

|PeopleImages / Shutterstock
Education |
By James V. Shuls | Read Time 1 minute minutes

The purpose behind the school transfer law is clear: students should not be trapped in failing schools. The implementation of the law, however, has created much consternation and concern about the ramifications the law will have. Many are worried tuition and transportation costs will bankrupt the unaccredited Normandy and Riverview Gardens School Districts. Others are worried that the transfer of many low-performing students to surrounding schools will lead to overcrowding or have a negative impact on those schools.

The solution I propose will help alleviate both of these concerns. Moreover, it will help those individuals that the state should be concerned about the most — the students in the failing school districts.

Read the full testimony: School Transfers: The Answer Is More Choice, Not Less

About the Author

James V. Shuls is an associate professor of educational leadership and policy studies at the University of Missouri St. Louis. His work has been featured in numerous media outlets, including Phi Delta Kappan, Social Science Quarterly, Education Week, The Rural Educator, Educational Policy, the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, and the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. He earned his Ph.D. in education policy from the University of Arkansas. He holds a bachelors degree from Missouri Southern State University and a masters degree from Missouri State University, both in elementary education. Prior to pursuing his doctorate, James taught first grade and fifth grade in southwest Missouri.

Similar Publications

Support Us

The work of the Show-Me Institute would not be possible without the generous support of people who are inspired by the vision of liberty and free enterprise. We hope you will join our efforts and become a Show-Me Institute sponsor.

Donate
Man on Horse Charging