Assessing a Very Costly Medicaid Expansion

Free-Market Reform |
By Patrick Ishmael | Read Time 1 min

In 2010, Congress passed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), a massive health care overhaul that asserted fresh federal control over nearly one-fifth of the U.S. economy. As written, the PPACA would have, among other things, forced states to expand their Medicaid programs or risk losing all of their existing Medicaid funding. Ultimately, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the law’s mandatory Medicaid expansion provision, finding that it was impermissible under Congress’s spending power. As a result, states do not have to choose between expanding their Medicaid eligibility or losing federal funding for their entire Medicaid programs. Indeed, many states have already rejected the expansion.

Missouri policymakers have a decision to make, but if they are going to seriously consider expanding the state’s Medicaid program, two fundamental — and so far, largely neglected — questions must be answered: How much would the expansion cost Missouri taxpayers, and how would the state pay for it?

About the Author

Patrick Ishmael is the director of government accountability at the Show-Me Institute. He is a native of Kansas City and graduate of Saint Louis University, where he earned honors degrees in finance and political science and a law degree with a business concentration. His writing has been featured in the Los Angeles Times, Weekly Standard, and dozens of publications across the state and country. Ishmael is a regular contributor to Forbes and HotAir.com. His policy work predominantly focuses on tax, health care, and constitutional law issues. He is a member of the Missouri Bar.

Similar Publications

Support Us

The work of the Show-Me Institute would not be possible without the generous support of people who are inspired by the vision of liberty and free enterprise. We hope you will join our efforts and become a Show-Me Institute sponsor.

Donate
Man on Horse Charging