Schizophrenic Public Policy on Dairy Products

Health Care |
By Christine Harbin | Read Time 3 minutes

On Sunday, the New York Times ran two articles about public policy for dairy products. One of the articles is about how an organization called Dairy Management, which was created by the United States Department of Agriculture, is pushing the sales of dairy products like cheese and milk. The other article is about New York City’s health commissioner, Dr. Thomas A. Farley, who leads initiatives to convince the public to consume less fat and sodium — nutrients that are plentiful in dairy products. The interesting thing about these two articles is their juxtaposition: While the government is encouraging consumers to consume more cheese (via Dairy Management), the government is also informing them to eat less of it (via the NYC health commission).

I find it interesting that Dairy Management is funded by levies imposed on farmers, while the federal government has paid hundreds billions of dollars in subsidies to farmers. Two market distortions do not a free market make; instead, they further distort the market. A simpler and more efficient way for the government to decrease dairy consumption would be to eliminate subsidies to the dairy industry. This would cause consumer prices to rise naturally, which would in turn lead individuals to consume less. There are many problems in public policy, and a great number of them are government-created. The solution is not more government, but less.

I also find it morally questionable interesting that Dairy Management focuses on exporting the very products that have been deemed too unhealthy for domestic consumers. Again from the article:

Dairy Management, which reported expenditures of $136 million last year, also received $5.3 million that year from the Agriculture Department to promote dairy sales overseas.

When the government subsidizes one thing and taxes another, individuals change their consumption as a consequence. No one knows the optimal mix of goods and services — your guess is as good as mine (or as good as a government official’s, for that matter). Individuals could achieve higher levels of welfare if they were allowed to choose for themselves the bundle of goods and services that they consume.

Incidentally, the Show-Me state has historically played an instrumental role in propping up dairy prices. From the first article (emphasis added):

For years, the federal government bought the industry’s excess cheese and butter, an outgrowth of a Depression-era commitment to use price supports and other tools to maintain the dairy industry as a vital national resource. This stockpile, packed away in cool caves in Missouri, grew to a value of more than $4 billion by 1983, when Washington switched gears.

About the Author

Christine Harbin Christine Harbin, a native of Wisconsin, joined the Show-Me Institute as a research analyst in July 2009. She worked as a policy analyst at the Show-Me Institute until her departure in early 2011. She holds undergraduate degrees in economics, mathematics, and French from the University of WisconsinMadison, and an MBA with an emphasis in operations management from the University of WisconsinEau Claire. She interned with the National Economic Council at the White House in Washington, D.C., during spring 2007. Prior to joining the Show-Me Institute, she worked as an advance planning analyst for hospitals and health care systems.

Similar Stories

Support Us

Headline to go here about the good with supporting us.

Donate
Man on Horse Charging