The Streetcar’s Future Ridership

State and Local Government |
By Patrick Tuohey | Read Time 2 minutes minutes

Almost every story about the newly opened Kansas City streetcar tells us that ridership is higher than expected, and indeed it appears to be. Daily ridership estimates have ranged from 2,700 to 3,500 before the system was opened, and the Star recently reported that daily averages have been over 6,400. Expect these ridership numbers to be featured in the inevitable campaign to extend the streetcar to UMKC.

Why is ridership so high? The Star has at least twice ascribed it to the “novelty” of the new system, both in the story linked above and here. The Star is likely correct, considering the experiences in two other new streetcar markets. Atlanta, for example, was crowing about its better-than-expected ridership numbers last year, and proponents were urging the city to consider expansion,

With this early success and ridership exceeding expectations by more than 20 percent, it’s never too soon to look ahead to Atlanta’s future.

Yet a year later, the system is being threatened with closure due to a list of problems, not the least of which being a decline in ridership,

After offering free fares for a year, the streetcar started charging $1 in January. Ridership plummeted. About 91,000 people rode the street in the first three months of this year48 percent less than the same period in 2015.

The same plight has befallen the streetcar system in Tucson, Arizona. Last March, the system was said to be carrying more riders than forecast 7 months after its launch. Yet last week, the Tucson streetcar announced it was curtailing its late night service in the name of “passenger efficiency.” The Tucson system is not free to ride either, charging $1.50 for a one-way fare.

The streetcar in Kansas City is free to ride, and for now it's a novelty. It may be months before ridership levels settle into their long-term levels as they have with older systems. Only once those numbers are known, and the impact of a fare is included, should policymakers decide if this is something worth extending to UMKC or beyond. Otherwise, the city risks wasting millions of dollars that could be better spent elsewhere.

About the Author

Patrick Tuohey is a senior fellow at the Show-Me Institute and co-founder and policy director of the Better Cities Project. Both organizations aim to deliver the best in public policy research from around the country to local leaders, communities and voters. He works to foster understanding of the consequences — often unintended — of policies regarding economic development, taxation, education, policing, and transportation. In 2021, Patrick served as a fellow of the Robert J. Dole Institute of Politics at the University of Kansas. He is currently a visiting fellow at the Yorktown Foundation for Public Policy in Virginia and also a regular opinion columnist for The Kansas City Star. Previously, Patrick served as the director of municipal policy at the Show-Me Institute. Patrick’s essays have been published widely in print and online including in newspapers around the country, The Hill, and Reason Magazine. His essays on economic development, education, and policing have been published in the three most recent editions of the Greater Kansas City Urban League’s “State of Black Kansas City.” Patrick’s work on the intersection of those topics spurred parents and activists to oppose economic development incentive projects where they are not needed and was a contributing factor in the KCPT documentary, “Our Divided City” about crime, urban blight, and public policy in Kansas City. Patrick received a bachelor’s degree from Boston College in 1993.

Similar Stories

Support Us

Headline to go here about the good with supporting us.

Donate
Man on Horse Charging