Tort Reform 3: Final Judgment

State and Local Government |
By David Stokes | Read Time 1 minute

Hopefully, this will be my last post about tort reform for a while. Combest has a couple of KMOX links today dealing with the issue. The question has largely been settled in Missouri, given that comprehensive tort reform was passed five years ago. How has it worked out? Very well for the insurance companies, as well as for the doctors who are paying lower malpractice rates.

I truly believe that the passage of tort reform was the best change for long-term economic growth that Missouri has made in decades. The benefits are realized every time a doctor decides against moving her practice across the state line. But I still don’t think a preemptive federal reform would be appropriate. This is a state issue, and Missouri has properly addressed it.

About the Author

David Stokes is a St. Louis native and a graduate of Saint Louis University High School and Fairfield (Conn.) University. He spent six years as a political aide at the St. Louis County Council before joining the Show-Me Institute in 2007. Stokes was a policy analyst at the Show-Me Institute from 2007 to 2016. From 2016 through 2020 he was Executive Director of Great Rivers Habitat Alliance, where he led efforts to oppose harmful floodplain developments done with abusive tax subsidies. Stokes rejoined the Institute in early 2021 as the Director of Municipal Policy. He is a past president of the University City Library Board. He served on the St. Louis County 2010 Council Redistricting Commission and was the 2012 representative to the Electoral College from Missouri’s First Congressional District. He lives in University City with his wife and their three children.

Similar Stories

Support Us

Headline to go here about the good with supporting us.

Donate
Man on Horse Charging