When Is a Transparency Bill Not a Transparency Bill?

Uncategorized |
By Audrey Spalding | Read Time 1 minute

When it’s used to hide unpopular legislation.

On Wednesday, the Missouri House took an otherwise laudable government transparency bill and used it to hide legislation that would create a government land bank in Kansas City. The transparency bill, S.B. 467, ballooned from just two pages to about 40 pages with the unwieldy amendment.

Some legislators continue to push the Kansas City land bank bill forward, despite the fact that a similar land bank in St. Louis City has failed spectacularly. The Saint Louis City land bank has a history of rejecting would-be buyers, and allowing area aldermen to have outsize influence over who is allowed to purchase vacant city property.

If Missouri legislators want to throw the land bank dice again in Kansas City, they’re free to do so, even in the face of St. Louis’ failure. But, perhaps they should do that in a more transparent way.

The irony of using a transparency bill to hide another bill 20 times its size would be funny, if it weren’t so sad.

About the Author

Audrey Spalding Audrey Spalding graduated in 2009 from the University of MissouriColumbia with dual degrees in journalism and economics. She became fascinated with local government issues while working as an education reporter at the Columbia Missourian, and realized the importance of holding elected officials accountable. Her coverage of the Columbia Public School District's tax levy increase election won a Hearst Journalism Award. Before joining the Show-Me Institute, Audrey worked for the institute as a research intern for a year, and during that time filed more than 500 requests for public information. She is originally from Michigan.

Similar Stories

Support Us

Headline to go here about the good with supporting us.

Donate
Man on Horse Charging